Have your say and stop bomb chemicals getting into the wrong hands

Attorney General's Office
Friday, 10 February, 2012


The Attorney-General’s Department’s Chemical Security program requires chemical manufacturers’ and users’ input to develop systems to prevent common chemicals being misappropriated and used in illegal bomb manufacture.

Industry and members of the community have until 30 March 2012 to comment on measures designed to reduce the risks of common chemicals getting into the wrong hands and being used to make homemade bombs.

There are literally tens of thousands of chemicals used daily in Australia for commercial and household purposes. There are over 400,000 chemical-based products on the market, which are used by some 570,000 workplaces and millions of Australian consumers.

The vast majority of these chemical products have important and legitimate uses. However, in the wrong hands, some chemicals can be used to make lethal weapons.

Terrorism remains a significant threat to western societies, including Australia. While terrorists use a wide range of weapons to pursue their objectives, the ease of availability of chemicals in Australia makes homemade explosives an ideal weapon.

In 2011, we saw the devastating effects of precursor chemicals when a homemade explosive device was detonated in Oslo, Norway, killing eight people and injuring 90. That bomb was created using chemical materials that are readily available in Australia, including fertiliser, nitromethane and aluminium.

So far, Australia has been fortunate in not having experienced a direct terrorist attack on its own soil. However, it has still been impacted significantly through terrorism incidents worldwide, many of which involved chemical explosives.

Australia’s National Terrorism public alert remains at ‘medium’, which means authorities believe a terrorist attack could occur. This ongoing concern has driven governments and industry to work together to determine practical ways of minimising the risk of chemicals being misused by terrorists to make homemade explosives.

Part of this work is a Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) that weighs up the costs and benefits of a number of different policy options, including a targeted awareness campaign, codes of practice and supply-chain regulation.

Stakeholders have an important opportunity to help shape government policy on this issue by commenting on the RIS. In particular, this is your chance to put forward your views and comment on issues, such as cost, effectiveness and likely uptake of a range of measures. These include: employee and contractor checking, inventory and consignment control, security during transport and storage, and point-of-sale procedures.

The Attorney-General’s Department (AGD) is particularly interested in receiving input from businesses that manufacture, handle or use any products that contain the following chemicals:

  • Ammonium perchlorate (NH4ClO4)
  • Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)
  • Nitric acid (HNO3)
  • Nitromethane (CH3NO2)
  • Potassium chlorate (KClO3)
  • Potassium nitrate (KNO3)
  • Potassium perchlorate (KClO4)
  • Sodium azide (NaN3)
  • Sodium chlorate (NaClO3)
  • Sodium nitrate (NaNO3)
  • Sodium perchlorate (NaClO4)

Comments and input received during the consultation process will inform the final Decision RIS, including the recommended course of action.

The public consultation period is scheduled to commence on 3 February and end on 30 March 2012.

To obtain a copy of the Consultation RIS and to find out how to make a submission, please refer to the AGD Chemical Security program website at www.chemicalsecurity.gov.au/RIS.

For further information, you can also contact AGD on (02) 6141 2925 or (02) 6141 3012.

Related Articles

Clinical Trial Transformation: Recent Changes and Future Predictions

Accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, we have seen a shift in clinical trials, with changes to...

International keynote to headline Accreditation Matters 2024

The landmark two-day conference will focus on the crucial role accreditation and conformity...

Govt agrees to all recommendations of ARC Review

The government has agreed to improve the governance of the Australian Research Council and to...


  • All content Copyright © 2024 Westwick-Farrow Pty Ltd