RAC and SEAC adopt their first opinions on restriction proposals

The Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) has adopted its two first opinions on proposals submitted by France. The first was to restrict dimethylfumarate (DMFu) in articles and the second to restrict lead and its compounds in jewellery.

In a parallel meeting, the Committee for Socio-economic Analysis (SEAC) agreed on draft opinions for the same restriction proposals.

RAC considered that there is a serious risk to consumers from the use of articles treated with DMFu and that the suggested restriction on the production and placing on the market of articles containing DMFu is appropriate in order to reduce the risk to consumers.

SEAC concluded in its draft opinion that a restriction of DMFu in articles is the most appropriate community-wide measure, and that the action is justified from a socioeconomic point of view. As foreseen by REACH, the draft opinion of SEAC will be published for public consultation. The final SEAC opinion is scheduled to be adopted later on.

The inclusion of DMFu in articles is controlled by a temporary ban requiring Member States to ensure that articles containing DMFu are not placed on or made available to the market. The ban was introduced due to several reports in many of the Member States of severe skin reactions (dermatitis) in consumers exposed to DMFu in articles, such as leather sofas and shoes. DMFu had been used as an antimoulding agent in the articles.

The French restriction proposal aims to make the temporary ban permanent. The scope and conditions of the proposed restriction are the following: articles or any parts thereof containing DMFu in concentrations greater than 0.1 mg/kg are prohibited from being produced and placed on the market in the EU. The restriction would apply to all types of articles containing DMFu. Manufacturing and import of the substance (DMFu) itself is not included in the restriction proposal.

RAC considered that lead contained in jewellery may significantly contribute to the exposure of children to lead by them putting it in their mouths, and that a restriction is therefore appropriate. RAC agreed in principle with the French proposal to have a restriction for lead in jewellery. However, after assessing the dossier and the information submitted during the public consultation, RAC suggested basing the restriction on the content of lead in articles unless it could be demonstrated that lead is not released should a child put a piece of jewellery in his or her mouth.

SEAC concluded in its draft opinion that the benefits for human health of the restriction of lead in jewellery appear proportionate to the costs of the restriction. SEAC proposed the restriction be based only on the content of lead in jewellery articles instead of release, as it is easier to measure in practice. Derogations for crystals and precious and semi-precious stones are proposed, as well as for jewellery more than 50 years old.