US Supreme Court rules that human genes are not patentable

Friday, 14 June, 2013

The United States Supreme Court has released its landmark decision in Association for Molecular Pathology et al v Myriad Genetics, Inc et al. The Court unanimously agreed that “A naturally occurring DNA segment is a product of nature and not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated, but cDNA is patentable because it is not naturally occurring.”

The decision helps to lay the foundation for continued research and application of diagnosis and treatment of diseases at the molecular level.

In supporting AMP’s position, the court’s detailed ruling noted, “In this case … Myriad did not create anything. To be sure, it found an important and useful gene, but separating that gene from its surrounding genetic material is not an act of invention.”

“We believe the High Court today removed a significant barrier to innovation in molecular pathology testing,” said Roger D Klein, MD, JD, AMP Professional Relations Committee Chair, “and we look forward to future advancements in clinical diagnostics and therapeutics that will accrue to the benefit of our patients and our field.”

The court’s decision can be found online at http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_8njq.pdf.

Related News

CSL fellowships fund immunity research, AI-designed proteins

Australian scientists Dr Carolien van de Sandt and Dr Rhys Grinter have each been awarded CSL...

Leukaemia Foundation funds ongoing blood cancer research at UWA

The $3m in funding is understood to represent the single largest non-government investment in...

Jian Zhou Medal recognises anaesthesia, blood pressure research

The Australian Academy of Health and Medical Sciences has announced Professor Britta Regli-von...


  • All content Copyright © 2025 Westwick-Farrow Pty Ltd