When skin cancer therapy backfires
Scientists at Austria’s Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP) have investigated how different forms of cancer therapy can influence the efficacy of subsequent therapies, finding that administering targeted therapy could jeopardise the effectiveness of immune-stimulating immunotherapies in skin cancer patients.
Scientists and clinicians have developed a host of strategies, drugs and treatments to combat cancer and its many forms, but within a few months of treatment, most tumours start growing back — they gain resistance to therapies. In such cases, two types of therapy are often applied to the same patients: targeted therapy acts fast and blocks vital molecular pathways within cancer cells, thereby stopping their proliferation; and immunotherapy mobilises and stimulates the patient’s immune cells to eradicate tumour cells, which can induce long-lasting responses, but acts less reliably than targeted therapy.
Clinicians often administer targeted therapy first until they observe resistance; only then do they turn to immunotherapy to finish the job. This strategy, however, is not failproof: some patients do not respond to immunotherapy nearly as well as they should, and their tumours continue to grow. In this case, scientists talk of cross-resistance: the tumours manage to evade the sequential action of multiple types of therapy whose modes of action differ entirely.
Tipped off by this peculiar phenomenon, researchers have started to wonder whether resistance to one type of therapy could have an influence on entirely different forms of treatment. IMP scientists from the lab of Anna Obenauf investigated the effect of resistance to targeted therapy on the composition of skin tumours in mice and its influence on subsequent immunotherapy. With the help of their collaborators at the Medical University of Vienna and in Switzerland, Australia and the UK, they confirmed their findings with clinical data and have now published their study in the journal Nature Cancer.
Cross-resistance: tumours recoil
“The skin tumours we study develop resistance to targeted therapy in 75–80% of cases, which is quite alarming,” said Lisa Haas, a recent PhD graduate from the Obenauf Lab and first author of the study. “We found that acquired resistance to targeted therapy has a strong impact on the tumour’s immune cell composition, which could lead to resistance to immunotherapy.”
The scientists found that tumours that had developed resistance to targeted therapy were short of a type of cells — dendritic cells — that are crucial to activate the immune system during immunotherapy. Not only were there fewer dendritic cells in these tumours, but they did not function properly. As a result, immunotherapy was ineffective in waking the immune system from slumber, and the tumours kept on growing, unnoticed.
“The good news is that clinical trials are ongoing to develop strategies to activate dendritic cells and improve the effectiveness of immunotherapy,” Haas said. “Our work provides solid evidence that resistance to immunotherapy arises in part because of the changes that occur within tumours after they’ve gained resistance to targeted therapy.” The researchers’ next plan of attack is to identify the molecules that affect the number and function of dendritic cells.
A strategy to prevent resistance
Clinicians are still exploring which kind of therapy they should employ first, and for how long. Such decisions can lead to very different outcomes for patients with cancer. This study brings a guiding light to the debate.
According to the researchers, it is essential to avoid resistance to targeted therapy to ensure that sequential immunotherapy treatment is effective. Targeted therapy as a first treatment should be limited to a short period of time, and a switch to immunotherapy should occur before the tumour becomes resistant. In cancers that are detected early, immunotherapy should be the first-line treatment to avoid resistance.
“We need to understand how therapies shape tumours and influence subsequent therapeutic responses — that certainly will open up new treatment opportunities and change the way we treat cancer patients,” Obenauf said. “Our results help honing our best weapons against skin cancer and could have an impact on clinical practices.”
The scientists argue for the 'carbohydrate-insulin model', which explains obesity as a...
Researchers reveal more than 50 distinct cancer, immune and connective cell types and states...
A probable cause of Alzheimer's disease is the leakage from blood into the brain of...