Genetic medicine revolution

ATA Scientific Pty Ltd

By Peter Davis
Friday, 11 December, 2020

Genetic medicine revolution

The quest to produce the vaccine for COVID-19 has raised concerns about Australia’s preparedness for a pandemic, and it has sharply focused attention on the ‘new’ age vaccines based on mRNA.

I say ‘new’ given the seminal paper1 that launched this field of nucleic acid vaccines was published in 1990! This was shortly followed by the first demonstrated mRNA-based vaccine to elicit an immune response in an animal2 in 1993.

Fast forwarding to 2015, Ulmer, Mansoura and Geall3 suggested that “vaccines on demand” are possible and laid out four attributes of self-amplifying mRNA vaccines summarised as follows:

  1. Raw materials that can be stockpiled and production equipment that can be co-located within a single facility.
  2. A synthetic and scalable process that is amenable to automation and rapid manufacture of a drug product, in the absence of biological systems.
  3. A robust, generic means to manufacture vaccines against many pathogen targets.
  4. A small manufacturing footprint with standard, disposable equipment.

In 2020 the world is now finding many novel mRNA vaccine candidates4 and the Australian Government is having a gamble on who might be the ones to back, investing millions of dollars to reserve some for Australia. Astutely, they have invested in a massive facility in Victoria.

The new facility will be built in Melbourne’s Airport Business Park and is expected to be operational by 2026. It will be funded through a joint venture between the federal government, which is putting $1 billion towards the project, and Seqirus — a subsidiary of biotech company CSL — which will contribute $800 million.5

This is great for cultured vaccines — and as Health Minister Greg Hunt stated, “It will provide support for pandemic flu, seasonal flu, antivenoms and Q fever” — but let’s not hold our breath as it will be 2026 before it is operational.

Australia invested heavily in reserving COVID-19 vaccines from several companies overseas. Moderna, BioNTech/Pfizer, CureVac, Imperial College London and Arcturus are all working on lipid nanoparticles (LNP) with mRNA. Surely a local facility that has capacity to create medicines for genetic diseases during ‘non-pandemic’ times and be easily mobilised for vaccine production would be a significant advancement in Australia’s preparedness.

The scale of such a facility has been egregiously overstated previously, considering the production of self-amplifying (saRNA) at a commercial scale does not require cell culture, complex purification or novel equipment. The dose concentration of a saRNA is exceptionally low and, in the case of a vaccine, Anna Blakney of Imperial College London stated that 100 mL can result in 1 million doses.6

The huge bioreactors used in cell-cultured vaccines arguably can be replaced with a beaker and a stir bar for the cell-free synthesis where RNA is produced from a DNA template using an enzymatic transcription reaction. This method is well defined, generic, high yield, fast, antigen-independent and can be used for all types of mRNA.

To get a start on this, a small lab which is a cleanroom is all that is needed. The components can be dropped in within a couple of months — and the total cost a fraction of the aforementioned investments. This would allow Australia the opportunity to create such drugs in-country, without spending the multi-millions on a hope we will access the products from big pharma. Perhaps it is time NSW put some skin in the game. When it comes to vaccine production we sadly lag behind Victoria and Queensland. Here’s a chance to be novel and build the future powerhouse of genetic medicine for Australia in Sydney. Hopefully, we won’t have to wait 30 years again!

  1. Wolff JA, Malone RW, Williams P, et al. Direct gene transfer into mouse muscle in vivo. Science 1990;247(4949 Pt 1):1465-8
  2. Martinon F, Krishnan S, Lenzen G, et al. Induction of virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in vivo by liposome entrapped mRNA. Eur J Immunol 1993;23(7):1719-22
  3. Ulmer JB, Mansoura MK & Geall AJ. Vaccines ‘on demand’: science fiction or a future reality. Expert Opinion Drug Discov 2015 Informa UK, Ltd. ISSN 1746-0441, e-ISSN 1746-045X
  4. Davis PA. Should we put all our eggs in one basket when we develop a vaccine?
  6. Blakney A.

Image courtesy of Cleanrooms Australia:

Related Articles

Aus invests $387m in the world's largest radio telescope

The Australian Government is investing $387 million to co-host the world's largest radio...

eDNA could be used to measure pollen levels

Autonomous airborne pollen samplers might help to provide a breath of fresh air for asthma and...

Photocatalyst can turn carbon dioxide into methane fuel

A new photocatalyst can produce methane fuel selectively and effectively from carbon dioxide...

  • All content Copyright © 2021 Westwick-Farrow Pty Ltd